Pages: [1] |
1. Minmatar Electronic Warfare - Chaff - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
a decently thought-out idea, needs further debate and discussion, well deserved attention.
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2008.10.12 06:16:00
|
2. Open mail from russian eve community. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Seleene Winterblink is Canadian. Just sayin'. i'm very much russian, and i don't take this sort of **** without serious retribution.
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2008.05.27 14:32:00
|
3. Open mail from russian eve community. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Uuve Savisaalo on 27/05/2008 14:29:01 14:28:29 Originally by: Winterblink Also, "russian" isn't a race. Perhaps i didn't see past your disturbingly weak attempt at humour. Ethnic discrimination by any other name, ...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2008.05.27 14:27:00
|
4. Open mail from russian eve community. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Uuve Savisaalo on 27/05/2008 14:25:12 Originally by: Winterblink Coins new term: ebayski its nice to see unbridled racism is alive and well in our fine community. As you've likely noticed during the csm election, a lot ...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2008.05.27 14:17:00
|
5. A simple idea to give Assault Frigates a gang orientated role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Uuve Savisaalo on 11/11/2007 03:55:39 Simple and elegant execution of something previously suggested on the forum (command module niche for sub-cruiser range)
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2007.11.11 03:55:00
|
6. How the Mindset of Development 'Should' Be. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Uuve Savisaalo on 15/08/2007 17:48:04 Originally by: Ferocious FeAr I'm glad NOS is being owned. Get some skills and learn how to pvp. oh lordy, another 'get some skills' response. firstly, nos isn't being owned if you'...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2007.08.15 17:48:00
|
7. Oh TomB :( - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sadist It's not rocket science, Oveur. Look: 2 fleets want to fight, but both know they will have to commit to the fight, and both sides want to increase their chances of winning, so what do they do? They blob. Blob via jum...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2007.05.29 20:00:00
|
8. Uknown signature escalating deadspace complexs are horrible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Uuve Savisaalo on 18/03/2007 02:51:02 This has to be the first time I heard of someone petitioning for inferior loot. Please, customer support. Please give this man some phat loot? He looks as though he is about to start sobbing u...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2007.03.18 02:52:00
|
9. Paging Tux - coming nanoship nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Drizit I have had a gutfull of the nerf brigade. Nerf this, nerf that, I can't win so I want it nerfed. Stuff it, just nerf everything and let's have a really boring and slow moving game that everyone gets tired of and leaves...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2007.03.13 13:35:00
|
10. Remote ECCM - has anybody noticed this? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Clavius XIV Originally by: Tuxford IMO all remote abilities should have no range or stacking penalty, to actualy encourage the use support ships in real/general combat. well, its not that there was a stacking...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2006.02.11 08:14:00
|
11. Remote ECCM - has anybody noticed this? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tuxford This has actually all be done. You just have to wait for the next patch. righto, making sure. had quite a bit of fun with this as you might imagine.
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2006.02.09 13:49:00
|
12. Remote ECCM - has anybody noticed this? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've brought up the issue several times since the EW changes went in but it hasn't been addressed of yet so I believe the time for a public post has come. Some of you are aware of the fact that when we went from a cummulative eccm point system to ...
- by Uuve Savisaalo - at 2006.02.09 06:41:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |